Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Mance stated that adjudication is intended to be a speedy provisional measure, pending final determination. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The House of Lords held that the words were not capable of referring to him. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
The constitutional question in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:10 pm
In the state of New York, a dog can be described as vicious even if the current case is the first time that the dog has ever bitten anyone. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
This is done through the HRLA’s annual Judicial Review Mooting Competition, Careers Day, and for the first time this year, the Lord Kerr Essay Competition, which was set up by the HRLA to honour the legacy and human rights contribution of Lord Brian Francis Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore, the former Supreme Court Justice, following a generous donation by his son, Patrick Kerr. 2022 Winning Essay by Cidalia Lewis-Lettington The interplay between climate change… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am
As Lord Kitchin stated, Dr. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
The crucial evidence was that of Ms Barber concerning her state of mind when she wrote the words complained of. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Dissenting on Rubin, Lord Clarke stated that allowing the enforcement of avoidance proceedings was in keeping with the principle of modified universalism requiring the English Courts, so far as is consistent with justice and UK public policy, to co-operate with the courts in the country of the principal liquidation to ensure that a company’s assets are distributed to the creditors under a single system. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm
Secretary of State for Home Department (Respondent) v AP (Appellant) (no 2) [2009] EWCA Civ 731 Supreme Court 23 June 2010 AP, who had been subject to a control order and who now continued to live at the same address under bail pending a deportation decision on grounds of national security, was entitled to continuing anonymity because of the risks he faced if his identity were revealed - read judgment We posted recently on a ruling by the Supreme Court that the social isolation… [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am
R (HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
Although the Court of Appeal never suggests this analysis, the case invites comparison with sufficiency cases in which the principle of an inventive concept derived from the specification can have a general application across a claim.This Kat notices that the composition of the Court of Appeal again yokes together two specialist intellectual property judges (Lords Justices Floyd and Lewison) in the panel of three (the other member of the court being Lord Justice Longmore), and that… [read post]
