Search for: "MURPHY V US" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:03 pm by Jay McDaniel
Copyright Management Information The case, Murphy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Murphy, on the other hand, contended that he was eligible for appointment as a detective pursuant to the Code, citing Ryff v Safir, 264 AD2d 349, as authority for this claim. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
Murphy having been privately prosecuted by Media Protection Services, a company used by the Premier League, in the ECJ's words to: [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am by Isabel McArdle
As we have reported, in May 2011 the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Global General Counsel
They held that such a prohibition cannot be justified either in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights or by the objective of encouraging the public to attend football stadiums.Judgment in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
The second case (C-429/08) has arisen from criminal proceedings against Karen Murphy, the landlady of a pub that screened Premier League matches using a Greek decoder card. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
The post, however, unfortunately does not provide us with a final answer on the matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Murphy 207 NY 240 : 100 NE 742 (1913); City of Rock Springs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm
That was one of the issues that Justice Murphy of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court had to decide in the recent case of Johansson et al v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:55 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: non-government schools are more likely to get students into university government schools http://j.mp/okLOyW mashable presents "A Brief History of the Emoticon" http://j.mp/odrffj this is an interesting development: "Lawyers in Murray trial using Facebook, Twitter to screen jurors" http://j.mp/qWD2YP steve martin has some advice for eddie murphy: "An Open Letter to Eddie Murphy" http://j.mp/ruhhoA but it's not very stylish:… [read post]