Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Rebecca Curtin v, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 2023 USPQ2d 535 (TTAB 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
A recent decision by Judge Mark S. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
Gibson Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
. - The opinion in Blackhorse v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:37 am
On one side of the split are the Second Circuit and United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the other. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In doing so, the Court had this to say about Concepcion: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 7:44 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Unfortunately, in Garcia he missed the mark. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Given the high percentage of the market open to Doncaster Pharmaceuticals even where it could not use the REGURIN trade mark, SEP's exclusive use of the REGURIN mark in the UK did not contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States for trospium chloride. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 5:51 pm
United States for how to make sense of a fragmented Supreme Court decision with no single majority opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
DABUS also encountered resistance in the United States, with the USPTO denying patent applications despite some indications of support within the field. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
