Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
According to the indictment, Leitner was previously a defendant in a criminal trial, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
The petition in Foster v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:27 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 5:19 am
Beazer had previously restated its financial statements and entered into a settled cease-and-desist proceeding with the SEC, as well as a deferred prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Department of Justice so that the department (who is charged with enforcing the law) could express its views on the constitutionality of the false marking statute. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:16 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:39 pm
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
The websites that have apparently assisted in the illegal viewing of sports games that were subject to the seizure under Title 18 of the United States Code included channelsurfing.nehq-streams.com, firstrow.net, ilemi.com and rojadirecta.org. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
Rasch, former head of the Justice Department's computer crime unit, pulled no punches in his reaction to the ruling. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
In New York State Club Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
