Search for: "Matter of D.(daniel)"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
The District's willingness to discuss the matter and investigate the Association's claims did not toll the filing period. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
It used to be that you'd get the reputation as the town drunk or the town letch, or the village idiot, and that reputation would follow you until you move on to another town. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
")In The Driver's SeatPost-Koken decision making dominated the field of auto insurance law in 2009By Daniel E. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:06 pm
Daniels, Ph.D., an internationally recognized author, speaker and expert on management and human performance issues, “surveys consistently show that more than 40% of people who quit do so because they feel that they weren’t appreciated for their contributions. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
The absence of Becker’s consent, the judge held, conclusively established a defense as a matter of law, thereby mandating summary dismissal of the Hoeys’s claim seeking to enforce the assignment. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
The absence of Becker’s consent, the judge held, conclusively established a defense as a matter of law, thereby mandating summary dismissal of the Hoeys’s claim seeking to enforce the assignment. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost non-existent.[14] … [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
Jerrold Nadler (D. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
In fairness to the high court, none of the evidence you’d have expected to have in about the importance of “Italian” when you are selling coffee was before the court, so it’s not as surprising they did something done. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
Because LIBOR is now much lower now than it was in 2005, the first error results in a substantially inflated amount of interest.The second error is no matter of small potatoes either. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
*This is the seventh post in a symposium on William Novak’s New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
., Brigham Daniels, Mark Buntaine, Tanner Bangerter, Testing Transparency, 114 NW. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Footnote 72 in Judge Rufe’s opinion references a report by plaintiffs’ expert witness, Allan D. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
The conspiring itself is a federal crime; it does not matter whether any crime was ever committed as long as the collaboration took place. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Final Rules – Summary Expenditures and Capitalized Costs Related to Severe Weather Events and Other Natural Conditions (Rules 14-02(b), (c), (d), (f) and (g)) The final rules require registrants to disclose: Expenditures expensed and losses The aggregate amount of expenditures expensed as incurred and losses,[4] excluding recoveries, incurred during the fiscal year as a result of severe weather events and other natural conditions.[5],[6] Disclosure is required if such expenditures and… [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Attorney Daniel Bernstein. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
Jurkovic, Esq.Law Offices of Daniel Jurkovic, PC 52 Chestnut StreetP.O. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Oystertec (Singapore): shape of pipe fittings, again a bare statement that d’s use wasn’t use as a mark. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But French law does provide for the Louvre's actions: last December last, France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d’État, confirmed that a public entity can forbid a private entity to take pictures of works inside a public museum. [read post]
