Search for: "Matter of Election Reform Amendment" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 11:44 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott The right of California voters to control their own legislative fate derives from the national political reform movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and in fact, Hiram Johnson was elected governor in 1910 in part due to his support for initiatives and political reform. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 6:03 pm by LindaMBeale
  As a result, whether corporations are taxpayers or not and whether they have First Amendment rights or not is a matter of law. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:03 am by Jeffrey
Politicians really only care about 2 things: re-election and campaign contributions. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:15 pm by Michael Markarian
They’re talking about amending or throwing out the statute that passed at the polls on Nov. 2. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:06 pm by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
A constitutional amendment overruling Citizens United and authorizing campaign finance reform would be a good start. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Yvonne Daly
These Bills include: National Asset Management Agency (Amendment) Bill 2011  - to amend the National Asset Management Agency Act 2009 to make provision for the National Asset Management Agency to acquire certain bank assets expeditiously; to make consequential amendments to that Act; and to provide for matters connected therewith. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm by David Lat
And yes, they matter more than before, thanks to the tough legal job market. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:12 am by Kara OBrien
In addition, under Section 957 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), brokers are not only prohibited from voting for the election of directors without customer instruction, but they are also prohibited from voting without instruction on executive compensation matters, including advisory votes or any other significant matter (as determined by the SEC). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
They take a step back to look at the long-term prospects of investment arbitration, including reforms that could bring substantial improvements to the investment arbitration process. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:47 am
 Under amended item 5.07 of Form 8-K, this new disclosure will be included in an amendment to the company's prior Form 8-K filing that reported the Say-on-Frequency vote. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:54 am by Kara OBrien
  The adopting release makes clear that the say-on-pay rules only apply for annual shareholders meetings at which directors will be elected, or a special meeting in lieu of such meeting. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:53 pm by Brannon Denning
Tushnet is largely silent about constitutional law (as opposed to constitutional structure) until the end of Chapter 1, when he speculates that the Supreme Court’s application of the First Amendment to campaign finance reforms might have had some meaningful effect on these political developments. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:30 pm by Yvonne Daly
The issue of reforming the political system is a live one at present and, as we look forward to a general election and the opportunities that it might bring, it is indeed important to consider the changes that might be made to our political system so as to increase its efficiency, its transparency, and its ability to properly represent the interests of the Irish people. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Senators opposed to proceeding to final passage will be required to continue debate as long as the subject of the cloture vote or an amendment, motion, point of order, or other related matter is the pending business. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:26 am by Kara OBrien
Non Enforcement Matters Is an SRO in the Cards for Investment Advisers? [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:02 am by Fiona de Londras
Three: What is it about the proposal for Seanad reform that seems to allow us to prepare an amendment and organise a referendum within what we have been promised is a relatively short time span before the General Election when other–and surely more important–matters such as the children’s rights referendum seem still to be on the long finger? [read post]