Search for: "Matter of T." Results 1341 - 1360 of 161,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This case deals with rather complex subject-matter and it may well be that the Board was right in rejecting the deletion of the feature under consideration. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:30 am by Carolyn Elefant
But when it comes to pushing an agenda that matters for solos, the ABA Brass (as distinguished from the members and staff) haven’t changed a bit. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Furthermore, they are not prior art under Article 54(2) EPC themselves, since they have not been disclosed before the filing date of the contested patent.Therefore it has not been demonstrated by the appellant to a sufficient standard what was orally made available to the public during the 57th Hardening Colloquium.3.1.3 Thus, the Board concludes that it has not been shown that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request was orally made available at the conference in 2001.(...)This… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, the statement in question would not have an impact on the definition of the subject-matter of the patent for the questions the Board had to decide in these proceedings. [5.3]It follows that the desired statement is not a proper subject-matter of the minutes. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:44 pm by Howard Bashman
“Brett Kavanaugh Didn’t Save Planned Parenthood Funding, No Matter What Susan Collins Seems to Think; On Monday, Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted to turn away two cases trying to kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid — but that doesn’t mean he’s suddenly friendly on abortion rights”: Jessica Mason Pieklo of Rewire.News has this report. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:06 pm by Elijah Yip
”  Baker’s co-plaintiff (Derek Scammon) responded to the HPD’s deletion comment with his own: “So I take it that HPD doesn’t care much about allowing freedom of speech? [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
In other words, your image matters. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 2:53 pm by Legal Profession Prof
An attorney who took the title to his client's motorcycle as collateral for fees in a criminal matter, reported it as stolen and sued for its return received a 90-day suspension from the Kansas Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:14 am by Rose Hughes
 The decision in T 1473/19 has many similarities with that of T 1127/16, in which the Board of Appeal revoked a patent for added matter occasioned by the lack of a single comma in the claims (IPKat). [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 11:13 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
In any case, in the absence of a request for reimbursement of the appeal fee, this matter does not constitute an ancillary issue to be dealt with in appeal proceedings (see T 242/05 of 20 September 2006, point 2.3, and T 2134/12 of 16 July 2013, point 3).7. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:05 am by Nico Cordes
Given the content of both applications and the nature of the outstanding objections, no new arguments can be conceivably brought forward by the applicant that could lead to the patentable subject-matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:05 am by Nico Cordes
Given the content of both applications and the nature of the outstanding objections, no new arguments can be conceivably brought forward by the applicant that could lead to the patentable subject-matter. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 331/87 is a decision that any serious EQE candidate ought to know. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:11 am by Deb Givens
  While state-federal cooperation in antitrust enforcement is likely to continue, this case demonstrates that the states can and will make unilateral decisions on antitrust matters. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:03 pm by Rebecca C. Morgan Stetson Law
According to the email about the user needs survey, "[t]he NLRC provides a variety of resources, training, technical assistance, and consultations with experts.... [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, as the Boards of Appeal have repeatedly held, whether or not the disclosure is sufficient, is a matter to be decided on the circumstances of each individual case. [read post]