Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Cunningham, this past spring, the Supreme Court brings state issues to the national stage once more. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:40 am
In Montana, 53% of voters rejected a "born alive" amendment to the state constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
” It was this line of reasoning that the majority of the Supreme Court adopted in reversing and vacating the state’s decision. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “the Supreme Court will hear a case early next month,” Seila Law v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:20 am
May 31, 2007States Move to Enact Laws Allowing the Death Penalty for Pedophiles:A Good Sign with Respect to Public Dedication to Protecting Children, ButPotentially Not the Most Effective Way to Do SoBy MARCI HAMILTON, FindLawLast week, the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the death penalty as appliedto a child abuser. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:02 am
The first day’s agenda includes a review of the Montana Supreme Court’s actions on new Rules of Civil Procedure and whether the committee wants to hold a hearing on them. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
The Supreme Court will be considering whether a state can enact rational abortion regulations aimed at protecting the health and safety of women, or whether it will reverse its previous decisions and require states to preemptively prove the absolute effectiveness of a safety regulation, even before that regulation goes into effect. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:42 am
Montana, one of this Term’s merits cases; in the brief, Cato urges the Court to assess the navigability of rivers on a “section-by-section” basis and thereby “send a strong message to state courts across the nation that judicial usurpations of property rights are just as unconstitutional as those undertaken by other branches of government. [read post]
22 May 2014, 12:52 pm
Utah: Also on Monday in yet another ACLU case, a federal trial judge in Utah ruled that the state must respect the existing marriages of the approximately 1,000 same-sex couples that got married in the "window" period between the federal court ruling last December 20, 2013, declaring that Utah's marriage laws violate the federal constitution, and January 6, 2014, when the United States Supreme Court stayed that ruling. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:01 am
Argument: Structure your argument based on at least five Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Argument: Structure your argument based on at least five Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm
In the federal circuits where there are now appeals court decisions striking down such bans, the new filing said, only Kansas and two other states — Montana and South Carolina — are still engaged in legal battles over enforcing their laws. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
If two states have already split payment of fees and costs running well into six figures to keep a case going before the Supreme Court, but it could be resolved now for a final five-figure amount, is it worth continuing? [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
Gavin Grimm Finally WinsThe Supreme Court declined to hear Grimm v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
In a Dec. 30 opinion, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a state law barring corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates or parties, saying Citizens United only applies to federal elections. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm
Supreme Court Where It's Procedure vs. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court? [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
MARCIA COYLE: The court on June 14 is going to take its first look at an appeal, a petition that's been filed by three corporations who are challenging the Montana Supreme Court's decision that its law banning corporate independent expenditures survives, despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:11 pm
The Court’s right-wing bloc also overturned Montana Supreme Court’s decision supporting common sense campaign finance regulation. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:49 am
The court disagreed with Fourth and Fifth Circuits on this issue, along with several district courts and the Supreme Court of Montana, that the contrary reading of the statute was the only reasonable one or that the agency’s interpretation was unreasonable. [read post]
