Search for: "PEOPLE v. JOHNSON" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,761
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  Newmaninvolved SJS/TEN, the autoimmune diseases (or different forms of the same disease) Stevens Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidural Necrosis. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, “each case is fact specific” (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of “the whole incident” (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 3:16 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Senators Baldwin and Johnson – Please Help This Wounded Vet, March 18, 2015 Forbes More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nothing in the statute restricts its application solely to harmful conduct directed at children (see, People v Bergerson, 17 [95 N.Y.2d 372] NY2d 398, 401 [noting that the prior version of statute was intended to be broad in scope]). [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:41 am
”  Such was the conclusion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Hefferan v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:31 am
  Lincoln stood for constitutional supremacy, and against the prospective binding authority of the Supreme Court’s betrayal of the Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]