Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 4,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
Backing up by one amendment, the Constitution includes the admonition that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
#Heckled, 18 First Amendment Law Review 1 (2020). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
The Court, capitulating, ruled in 1952, that constitutional amendments have higher standing than ordinary laws. 5. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber on the second impeachment (WBALTV). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Just 10 days ago, the idea of a second impeachment was almost unfathomable. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
January 6 riots were clearly political, aiming to obstruct the congressional certification of the electoral victory of President-elect Joseph Biden and, more broadly, to contribute to the effort to have President Trump maintain power in a second presidential term. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
************************ In 2018, Columbia Law School professor John C. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
PDF Version A review of Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash's "The Living Presidency: An Originalist Argument Against Its Ever-Expanding Powers" (Harvard University Press 2020) *** Saikrishna Prakash, the James Monroe Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia, has written a terrific book. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 7:12 am
Ayres is the Townsend Professor at Yale Law School, where Jonnalagadda is a student. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
This argument lumps together numerous wildly disparate policies: many were attempts to interpret state election laws and others were attempts to apply federal law consistent with the Supremacy Clause. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
" Second, on the morning of January 6, Trump gave a speech on the White House Ellipse that stretched more than an hour. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 4:48 pm
Here, Stanford Law Professor Michael McConnell discusses the 25th Amendment and Impeachment as potential vehicles for removing the President from office. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 7:43 am
” Stanford Law Professor David SklanskyBut the First Amendment protects even wildly irresponsible speech unless it is calculated to produce imminent lawlessness. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 5:05 am
Law professor and 25th Amendment expert Brian Kalt explained in 2019 two scenarios in which activating Section 4 might be appropriate: The first is a president whose impairment is severe enough that the helm is, effectively, unmanned, even if he is still somehow able to claim that he is able to discharge his powers and duties. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
The Twelfth Amendment says that “The President of the Senate,” i.e., the Vice President, “shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates” from the Electoral College “and the votes shall then be counted. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am
The court held that this serves to demonstrate a “compelling state interest,” the first prong of strict scrutiny The court then applies the second prong, whether the law is “narrowly tailored,” that it uses the “least restrictive means,” to meet that compelling state interest. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 11:42 am
It turns out that Congress passed the first law requiring such authentication by a State's executive in 1792, after the first, but before the second, presidential election. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 3:06 pm
It turns out that Congress passed the first law requiring such authentication by a State's executive in 1792, after the first, but before the second, presidential election. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 2:17 pm
The alternative to systematic reliance on pardoning is what the late Professor Dan Freed described twenty years ago as “the more demanding road toward democratic reform. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
California Supreme Court (2020): Nor second-degree murder, on account of a new law prohibiting courts from imputing malice aforethought, an element of murder, to someone based solely on their participation in a crime. [read post]
