Search for: "Park v. Powers"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
[yet] the absolute test is not the exercise of power of control, but the right to exercise power of control. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am
Park 610, LLC, 2010 WL 305201 at *27 (S.D.N.Y., January 26, 2010) (Del. law), Kelly v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
Microsoft, in which the court had to balancing the US government’s investigatory powers with the freedom of operation and protection of consumer privacy laws. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
Supreme Court decision in Attorney General v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
In Lavan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:10 am
[11] Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 8:28 am
Consider Bowditch v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:28 pm
One v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
For instance, in 1950, in Rex v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Apparel Mart also has the power to withhold payments for goods received in the event it determines that any manufacturer has breached the Supplier Code of Conduct, and ultimately to terminate the agreement for such breaches. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 11:49 am
Regents Park Invs., Inc., 225 So. 3d 884, 885-86 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
“I’m not a mobster or a high-powered Bond villain. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:05 am
After the video had been running for 20 or 25 seconds, Whaley reached over and pressed the power button, sending [the computer] into hibernation mode. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
In Union Park Memorial Chapel v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Patricia Londono on UKHRB, “Sir Cliff v BBC: A new era for police investigations? [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Bray v. [read post]
