Search for: "Parker v. Parker." Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
Warby Parker * Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Herbert H Post & Co. v Sidney Bitterman, Inc., 219 AD2d 214, 224 [1st Dept 1996], quoting Franklin v Winard, 199 AD2d 220, 221 [1st Dept 1993]). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Constitutional Accountability Center, Ashwin Phatak looks at Parker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Google also submitted that the Judge was bound by a decision of Kenneth Parker J in R( British Telecommunications) v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The Court of Appeals allows his case to proceed.The case is McGarry v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Which is why we have the doctrine of "judicial estoppel," which means that you cannot take a legal position in one proceeding and then take the opposite legal position in another proceeding.The case is DeRosa v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 11:15 am by Jeff Marshall
The cash that is converted to income is recouped with interest over time as annuity payments are made to the community spouse.My law partner, Matt Parker, was the attorney on the case, James v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:07 pm
The answer to that question of first impression, in the case of Carolina Power & Light Company v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:11 am
  The District's City Council has banned handguns, and that ban is being challenged in Court in the case of Shelly Parker v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There are exceptions to that rule, but the courts are not that forgiving.The case is Jenkins v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 12 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Christopher Assoc., 257 AD2d 1, 12 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 1:12 pm by Giles Peaker
However, in any event the order made was determined on a basis that had been customary under the 2004 Act on the authority of Parker v Waller, but is unsustainable under the 2016 Act. [read post]