Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 28,408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 6:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
In a short Twitter thread, Orin presented this question as follows: Let’s say Congress passes a new law, the State Law Is Dumb Act (SLID). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
The approval is in defiance of the US Supreme Court ruling in Allen v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 11:45 am
The case is called ACA Connects v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 5:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
The complaint, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:40 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:08 pm
Many laws have been passed in both the United States and the State of Florida to protect the rights of consumers. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:31 am
In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hodes & Nauser v Schmidt that the Kansas Constitution protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:45 pm
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court recently abrogated the Knighten Rule in State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
If they are (as Wilson's study on state R&D tax credits suggests) a zero-sum game in which states or cities are compelled to pay to attract "star scientists," maybe they should be prohibited under the dormant Commerce Clause, as the Sixth Circuit suggested in Cuno v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:47 am
” Any changes to the Constitution passed by that constitutional convention must then be approved by two thirds of the states. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
As I have previously noted, Georgia recently passed a Comprehensive Revised Evidence Code patterned on the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm
For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Supreme Court ruling in Daubert v. [read post]
