Search for: "People v Lord" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by Matthew Flinn
R (on the Application of AC) v Bershire West Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 247 – Read judgment. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
")Todd Rundgren - "Lord Chancellor's Nightmare Song" ("And bound on that journey you find your attorney. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Shocking and offending people is sometimes a necessary part of effective protest. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co [1944] A.C. 265, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that “[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Hoffmann’s foreword In his commendatory foreword to the work, Lord Hoffmann states that: [T]he most admirable part of Mr. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am by Adam Wagner
Shocking and offending people is sometimes a necessary part of effective protest. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
Lord Hoffmann’s foreword In his commendatory foreword to the work, Lord Hoffmann states that: “[T]he most admirable part of Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am by Marko Milanovic
It is in the final analysis for American lawyers and people to determine how their Constitution applies abroad. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:56 am by Adam Wagner
The ten principles Courts tend to rely upon Lord Justice Schieman’s list of principles in Attorney General v MGN Limited and Others [1997] EMLR 284, [1997] 1 All ER 456. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am by INFORRM
  The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
The point was considered in the seminal decision of Eady J in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EMLR 10. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
It was agreed that the correct test for dishonesty was the "combined" test of Lord Hutton in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 being that: "before there can be a finding of dishonesty it must be established that the defendant's conduct was dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people and that he himself realised by those standards his conduct was dishonest. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
Previous Conditions Lady Justice Smith and Lord Justice Mummery both considered whether the conditions in which the person concerned had lived previously were relevant. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am by Rosalind English
Neither the local authority nor the court is seeking to open windows into people’s souls. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:17 am by Charon QC
I have fond memories of Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 from my days as a law student. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
 So far she has only unearthed Lifestyle Management Ltd. v Frater [2010] EWHC 3258 (TCC) (10 December 2010, noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
British bill of rights ‘will put judges in a difficult position’ Lord Woolf, a former senior law lord warned that a British bill of rights would complicate the position of courts, which would have to consider the two conventions when deciding cases. [read post]