Search for: "People v. Doctor"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
MAN SAYS FAMILY DOCTOR WASN'T QUALIFIED TO TREAT HIS EYE CONDITION, Salandro v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Who’s going to want to bring a note from their doctor indicating that they can do this? [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:43 pm
By Nicole KilloranMcCormack v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Thus net impression may differ as between an ad targeted to a diabetes patient or a doctor treating diabetes. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 9:52 am
, Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:59 am
In the case of Cardozo v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
In his March 8, 2017 decision in Dawn M. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
” Brenman v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
Imposing a moratorium as a remedy makes no more sense than the nineteenth-century doctors bleeding patients as a remedy.But will she? [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:52 am
However, Russell Alexander posted some comments yesterday on the recent decision in Kirby v Kirby that has given me pause for thought. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am
” He added that this proposal would also include graduates from two-year junior colleges and doctoral programs, stating: “I know of stories where people graduated from a top college or from a college, and they desperately want to stay here… and they can’t. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Congress can tax people who do not buy health insurance, but cannot compel purchase. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
The decision is Estate of Donald Farb v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:40 pm
The Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
This includes my own recent work, as my doctoral research at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford examined “chilling effects” online, that is, how online surveillance, and other regulatory activities, may impact, chill, or deter people’s activities online. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:37 am
But I think it is entirely possible that he would vote to strike down Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:43 am
As Lord Bingham said in R v Cambridge Health Authority ex parte B, I have no doubt that in a perfect world any treatment which a patient, or a patient’s family, sought would be provided if doctors were willing to give it, no matter how much it costs, particularly when a life was potentially at stake. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Careful takes a look at its data and concludes that the doctor might just be right. [read post]
