Search for: "Reed v. State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
The leading judgment in the Supreme Court was given by the President, Lord Neuberger (with whom Lords Kerr and Reed agreed). [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, and Lady Arden. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
HTC (The Prior Art) (Ars Technica) (IPKat)   US Copyright President Obama discusses three strikes anti-piracy law (TorrentFreak)   US Copyright – Decisions Supreme Court: Registration requirement of 411(a) not jurisdictional for copyright claims: Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
HTC (The Prior Art) (Ars Technica) (IPKat)   US Copyright President Obama discusses three strikes anti-piracy law (TorrentFreak)   US Copyright – Decisions Supreme Court: Registration requirement of 411(a) not jurisdictional for copyright claims: Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm by Hank Fasthoff
  It provides a defense to an infringement claim when the alleged similarities are merely the use of (i) common scenes or themes, see Reed-Union Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Jones, when the relevant online activity is equally accessible nationwide but its content focuses on the forum state and the tortfeasor has knowingly caused the plaintiff to suffer reputational and emotional harm in the forum state, a question left open by the Supreme Court’s decision in Walden v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am by Jay Willis
Reed, the Washington state disclosure case in which the Court recently granted cert. [read post]
“At least five Justices agreed the Individual Mandate reads more naturally as a command to buy health insurance than as a tax, and those five Justices agreed the mandate could not pass muster under the Interstate Commerce Clause,” District Judge Reed O’Connor wrote in Texas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
(As enacted, RFRA also provides religious exceptions from state and local laws, but the Supreme Court held that aspect of RFRA unconstitutional in 1997 in City of Boerne v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Lucy has the exciting details.In other news, the Law Society Gazette reports the comments of the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger in the Ambrosiadou v Coward case last week, that court hearings should not be private. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 5:34 am
  That said, a right of self-defense, especially in one's home, existed at common law as confirmed by the 1744 case of Mallock v. [read post]