Search for: "Russell v. United States"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
A mention in this regard may also be made of the developments in the United States and United Kingdom where this right has had [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am
Co., 13 N.Y. 31 [1855]), and a few decades later the United States Supreme Court rejected it also (Grigsby v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
United States, in which the Court also heard oral argument yesterday. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
Date: Wednesday, December 8 Time: 2:00 – 3:30 PM ET Location: National Press Club’s Murrow Room. 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045 The panel follows Supreme Court arguments of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:40 am
As Wikipedia notes, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines “are rules that set out a uniform sentencing policy for individuals . . . convicted of felonies and serious . . . misdemeanors in the United States federal court system. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:37 am
The United States Supreme Court has accepted for review a new patent case that will determine what burden of proof is required to challenging a patent’s validity in court. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:24 am
Part II provides a brief summary of the historical and intellectual background to the initial development of corporate contractarianism in the United States, and then explains the theory’s key normative characteristics. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:55 pm
Timothy Russell, 2010 Cal. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
United States, with Steven F. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm
Harvey Leroy Sossamon III is a prisoner in the Robertson Unit of Texas state prison system, in Abilene. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
United StatesDocket: 09-1554Issue(s): 1) Whether the Supreme Court's decision in Yeager v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
Primeaux In one of its last acts before its summer 2010 recess, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-awaited case of Bilski v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
Gore (1996) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Miller, editor ; with Louis Aucoin.Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Constitutional LawKF4930 .O75 2010The origins of the necessary and proper clause / Gary Lawson ... [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
Body: On October 6, 2010, United States District Judge John E. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
"In United States v. [read post]
