Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 11:23 am
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government et al, HHJ Waksman QC, hearing 23 March 2012, read judgment Running a hearing can be difficult enough when you are sitting as a judge and are faced with parties in a civil case. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
Gross mistake is a Texas state common law standard that has been used to attack arbitration awards. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
(stating scope of authority depends on the agreement). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm
Pendelton King Et Al. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
” Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act US v Jason Pleau, et al – Federal Criminal Indictment 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
So, do you remember the article I posted the other day about accounting for a pool of loans and how values are based on assumptions about the performance of the pool into the future? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm
Fund Corp. et. al., 18 N.Y.3d 1, 935 N.Y.S.2d 551 (N.Y. 2011) The New York Court of Appeals held that New York Labor Law § 240(1) could apply to injuries caused by a falling object whose base stands at the same level as the injured worker. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:40 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
BROIN, ET AL., Petitioners, vs. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The case, Marmet Health Care Center Inc. v Brown et al. essentially acts as a bar to plaintiff arguing that these agreements violate public policy. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, representing 26 states, followed by Michael D. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
The The Supreme Court Decision in KURNS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CORSON, DECEASED, ET AL. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm
He pointed to the very liberal approach taken by the US Supreme Court to controversial messages, as exemplified in its recent decision in Snyder v Phelps et al 562 U.S. (2011) (a case concerning homophobic picketing outside military funerals by a church group who wanted to communicate their belief that God hated the US for its tolerance of homosexuality in the American military). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:20 am
In the meanwhile, a much quieter, but much starker drama unfolds in the wake of Pretty , Purdy et al. [read post]
