Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D B"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 10,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 8:20 am
We identify the following objectives to which charging foreign hackers can contribute: (a) attributing malicious cyber activity, (b) disrupting hacker networks, (c) coordinating with further U.S. government actions, (d) providing restitution for the victims and credit to defenders, (e) pressuring states to refrain from future malicious activity and (f) supporting the emergence of robust norms. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:54 am
(d) Effective date Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any regulation prescribed by the Bureau under subsection (b) shall apply, consistent with the terms of the regulation, to any agreement between a consumer and a covered person entered into after the end of the 180-day period beginning on the effective date of the regulation, as established by the Bureau. ( Pub. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:54 am
(d) Effective date Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any regulation prescribed by the Bureau under subsection (b) shall apply, consistent with the terms of the regulation, to any agreement between a consumer and a covered person entered into after the end of the 180-day period beginning on the effective date of the regulation, as established by the Bureau. ( Pub. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:08 am
Chris Anderson Roofing Co., 112 N.J.Super. 383, 271 A.2d 451 (Co.1970), aff'd 117 N.J.Super. 497, 285 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1971). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005 Amendments. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Brower suggests that the IRS – and some states – issue the Form 1099-INT, even though not required to do so, because it encourages taxpayers to report the interest income. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
Sections A, B, C and D of the commentary all help to provide further context and perspective.But he is critical. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am
., 09-CV—780 JAH in United States District Court of California. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:08 am
§ 1441(b), under which non-federal question case may be removed from state to federal court "only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought," is jurisdictional defect, rather than procedural irregularity that may be waived, and thus, because federal court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review remand order based on jurisdictional defect raised at any time… [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:40 am
B. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am
The United States has an interest in ensuring that digital asset technologies and [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
In this edition, I think the most interesting case (of a number of interesting cases) is United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
State, supra. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Ben Cardin (D-MD), noticed the delay. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
It will be interesting to see what the Advocate General and the CJEU make of the questions. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
Yet, parties still can’t seem to comply with all the requirements, even though it would definitely be in their best interest, as well as their client’s best interest to do so. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 10:00 pm
Section 258.20(2)(b) gives the Director of State Courts the authority to remove eviction cases after two years if no money judgment has been docketed. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:12 am
We’ve always said that being able to get into state court dockets. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
Check a new box that was added to Form D. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
’ North Carolina General Statutes § 14-458.1(a)(1)(d).State of North Carolina v. [read post]
