Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 2:23 am
The State purportedly has more than 18000 villages with uninterrupted power supply. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
(Hat tips: Clark Lindsey.)Speaking of COTS, this blog is not Space War Probe: But the third quarter issue of MilsatMagazine focuses on COTS business.Newspace and the "Netscape moment": Leonard David overviews things (Space News).V-Prize visions: Zip over to lawyer and great guy Jack Kennedy's Spaceports, for v-cool news on the V-Prize challenge. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:33 pm
New Jersey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
" I remember that in the Plowshares v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
Cool!! [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:58 pm
As previously discussed here, Danforth concerns a state court's authority to apply retroactively Supreme Court criminal procedure rulings and it is a spooky cool case for true law geeks. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:32 am
Law is Cool has previously done an entry and a podcast on the Khadr case. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
"And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has a post titled "Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 10:05 pm
Nacre AS v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:17 pm
This is a case you gotta read.GRICE v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:30 am
Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Medellin v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:51 pm
And to see the cool way of that nigger -- why, he wouldn't a give me the road if I hadn't shoved him out o' the way. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
Sheff, Leo V. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:16 am
Allocated v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
It's Soros's world, after all - the one in which the real enemy is the Bush administration, and the United States will have to undergo a process of 'de-nazification'.I think, too, that if I were an American Jew, I would start to have some worries. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
United States, 996 F.2d 1121, 1125 n.3 (11th Cir. 1993); Crimm v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
United States and Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
The question presented in Danforth is pretty simple: "Are state courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965) and United States v. [read post]
