Search for: "STATE v NOT AFRAID" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance, the complaint asserts that Hurley’s letter “falsely stated that neither the University nor Campus Police ever received any reports from Ms. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm by editor
Even many federal and state agencies have subpoena power, though generally with a limited scope. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
Some employees aware of and troubled by fraudulent schemes may be afraid to come forward due to a fear of retaliation by the employer. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
This has led to situations in which people accept assistance earlier than they would like because they are afraid they will lose the capacity to consent later (for a particularly well-known case, see here). [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
I’m afraid I’m going to gush about one and be a little bit hard on the other. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
’”[6] Perhaps what some are afraid to ask is this: Does the public really want to watch what some policymakers and regulatory advocates consider to be more “culturally enriching” or “civic-minded” content, or would they rather tune into something else? [read post]