Search for: "STORM v. STATE" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2010, 5:39 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
Yesterday, the Court issued a published decision in the case of Cvijetinovic v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:44 pm by Kevin Funnell
One of the advantages of a national bank or federal thrift charter used to be that for those banks or thrifts that engaged in mortgage lending on a multi-state scale, the mortgage operations could be housed in an operating subsidiary that had all the benefits of federal preemption that were afforded the parent bank or thrift (as confirmed by the Watters v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Click Here EPA, DOJ, State of Hawaii, environmental groups, reach agreement with the City and County of Honolulu to address wastewater collection and treatment systems. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:09 am by Jeremy Tyler
” The Sheffield Court turned to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm by Simon Gibbs
  To date, my office hasn't been stormed by a pitchfork and flaming torch wielding mob. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The environmental projects McWane will perform address storm water contamination at numerous locations; reduce mercury emissions in Provo, Utah, and Tyler, Texas; reduce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions in Bedford, Ind., and Anniston, Ala.; and enhance air quality in Coshocton, Ohio. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:50 am by Stephen Fairley
It's almost taking law firm marketing back to the Stone Age—or at least pre Bates v State Bar of Arizona (1977). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
 He’s steering a right-of-center Court through a left-of-center government and knows which storms his ship can handle and which it cannot. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]