Search for: "Southern California Law Review"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 10:41 am
Nonetheless, the FDA must still be notified and will subsequently review the modified labeling to ensure compliance with FDA regulations. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
California Appellate Districts, August 19, 2008 Zumbrun Law Firm v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:49 am
I am also interested in law review articles on this topic. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
California, 13-494, is back again, evidently to give the Justices a chance to review the newly arrived record. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
The Associated Press (via the Sacramento Bee) reports that prosecutors have asked the Court to review a decision holding unconstitutional the Mount Soledad cross in La Jolla, California. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:06 pm
In other states, legislators have started to consider similar laws. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 12:00 am
Call 911 According to the law, you must inform the local authorities of major accidents (property damage worth more than $1,000) and the California DMV of minor accidents. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:27 pm
One of my favorites is a student work by a woman, Ernestine Tinsley, in the Southern California Law Review. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
The plaintiff's first complaint alleged injuries arising from a defective artificial hip, asserting claims for negligence, strict liability, violation of California's Unfair Competition Law, and wanton and reckless misconduct. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:49 am
Take for example Southern California Pizza Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Event Jurisdiction and Protective Coordination: Lessons from the September 11th Litigation ROBIN EFFRONUniversity of Chicago - Law SchoolSouthern California Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 2, 2008 Abstract: Shortly after the tragic events of September 11, 2001, Congress passed the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (ATSSSA). [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
California, 20-18. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
' | The IPKat—the new features just keep on coming | Book review: Art and Modern Copyright – the Contested Image Never Too Late 221 [Week ending 5 May] Book review: Competition Law and Intellectual Property in China | Assigned or not assigned? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm
In 2012, the feds terminate Southern California no-otter zone where otters are removed (by non-lethal means) to prevent them from eating shellfish that commercial fishers rely on. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
District Court for the Southern District of California 2014). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Financial Review and The Australian covered the case. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight the top fifty pieces of 2017 authored by The Regulatory Review staff contributors. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
District Court for Southern District of New York’s prior decision to remand the issue to the Department for further explanation. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
Deferred action is one form of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law. [read post]
