Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Gardner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
This law suit was originally filed in August of 2010 in the California Superior court but was later removed to federal court in Sept of 2010. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:18 pm
The employees filed a class action lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court against Eskaton Properties and California Healthcare Consultants. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
So, the court denied discovery and let the superior court take the next step, to dismiss the class action (most likely).The case is Starbucks v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:50 am
In City of Garden Grove v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
The California Supreme Court gave readers a "two-fer" when it issued its long-awaited opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 135 Cal.App.4th 263, 285-86 (1999)). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
The District Court, however, remanded the action to state court on its own motion for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:36 am
The court says Yelp’s website constitutes a public forum (but only in the anti-SLAPP sense, not the state action sense, a point made in the uncited Prager U v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm
FINRA, 208 Cal.App. 4th 1125 (2012), the California Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s dismissal of the FA’s petition. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California 2005). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of the United States seems poised to reach the same result in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:53 am
”Judge Fitzgerald was persuaded that the California court of appeals County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 3:31 pm
Superior Court (Olmstead), the Supreme Court will determine to what extent class counsel shall have access to pre-certification communications with putative class members.PIONEER ELECTRONICS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
Aside from the important substantive issues raised in the case — California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
Proposition 65, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in AFL-CIO v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
On April 18, 2008, the plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit against Qualcomm in California state Superior Court in San Diego, California. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
" In California, those convicted of misdemeanors can obtain direct review as of right in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Superior Court 210 Cal.App.4th 1006. [read post]
