Search for: "State of Florida, Inc." Results 1341 - 1360 of 7,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2011, 6:37 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaOpinion Date: 1/14/11Cite: Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm by Bruce E. Sands
Allstate Investment Properties, Inc., (So.3d ---, 2011 WL 3107801) the Personal Representative of the Estate of Kathleen L. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:51 am
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a decision in the case of In re Prudential of Florida Leasing, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL 445368 (11th Cir. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:54 am by Allison Tussey
Gregory Fusca, 46, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was sentenced to 170 months in prison, in connection with his operation of RC Innovations, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:42 am by Mary Whisner
United States, 134 S.Ct. 2077 (2014), Google Scholar )Florida v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm by Mary Whisner
United States, 134 S.Ct. 2077 (2014), Google Scholar )Florida v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:54 pm
While Florida is one of only a handful of states to apply the doctrine, its impact has been watered down by arbitrary damage caps created by the Florida Legislature. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 7:27 am by assoulineberlowe
The Supreme Court of the United States has granted a petition for certiorari in the case styled as Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On December 13, 2011, Twin-Star International, Inc. of Delray Beach, Florida and TS Investment Holding Corp. of Miami, Florida (collectively, “Twin-Star”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
As to the promissory estoppel claim, the district court held in an earlier order that under Florida law, a foreign licensee could not state a claim for promissory estoppel against its licensor; however, Kroma EU was able to proceed against Tillett under a breach of contract theory. [read post]