Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
"  This year's IP Ball 2015 is fast approaching and this Kat hopes that you will not be missing out. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
  This question was recently answered by the District Court of Oregon in Jacobus Rentmeester v Nike Inc., (No.3 : 15-cv-00113-MO). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm by Kevin
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989); United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies  illegally process their personal information. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:23 pm
Since then, the Sixth Circuit has applied the "relatedness" test in Parks v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am by Kelly Buchanan
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]