Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 1341 - 1360 of 19,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (ABS Partnership v AirTran Airways, (AD 3d 24, 29 [1st Dept 2003].) [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm by Jim Lindgren
Even then, these categories have consistently been interpreted in the most limited form conceivable.For example, in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm by NARF
Patuxent Facility (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html North Dakota v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding St [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Also because of the combination, FOSTA enabled a Section 230 exclusion for civil claims for state commercial sex promotions but not for state sex trafficking claims. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Interior (Land into Trust; Alaska Tribes)United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Native American Rights Fund
McKenna (state escrow statute) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlEstate of Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The State of Campaign Finance Policy: Recent Developments and Issues for Congress. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak explains that Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:54 am by Robert J. Terry
Almost three in 10 in-house lawyers said they used more alternative billing arrangements in 2010, and 53 percent said they used strictly flat-fee billing on a case or project, up from 48 percent in 2009. [read post]
They claimed that after Roe v Wade was overturned in June 2022, the groups stopped aiding Texan women to leave the state to get abortions—because of the fear of prosecution under the states abortion ban. [read post]