Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1341 - 1360 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 1:27 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Finding that the Board improperly relied upon documents outside the record, which were not before Court for its review, the Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court's ruling dismissing Claimant's appeal and remitted the matter to the Board "for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief announces that Justice Elena Kagan has the opinion of the court in Sveen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But plaintiff says collateral estoppel cannot attach because he never had a chance to appeal that state court ruling to the Appellate Division, as that court dismissed his appeal as moot. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
In response, the State argues that this issue was not adequately preserved for appeal and should therefore not be entertained by the court at this time. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm by Richard A. Epstein
  The final sentence of Kennedy’s opinion limply concludes, “The judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals is reversed”—full stop. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Rosa (Social Advocates For Youth, Real Party in Interest) (1st Dist. 2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, a dense 24-page opinion filed by the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District (Division 4) on May 1, and later ordered certified for publication on May 24, 2018. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:12 pm by H. Scott Leviant
  In Shine, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Four) reviewed de novo whether a demurrer to a reporting time pay complaint was properly sustained on res judicata grounds. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The grounds for the decision were published 26 March 2018.We usually only have  board of appeal decisions, but I'm told this is an important case as it relates to the CRISPR technique of DNA manipulation. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under Judiciary Law § 487, an attorney who “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party; or . [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
I have no direct knowledge, but I’m guessing there will be an appeal based on the fact that Dr [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am by Stephen Wermiel
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit rejected Hughes’ request. [read post]