Search for: "State v. David" Results 1341 - 1360 of 14,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am by Ambassador P. Michael McKinley (ret.)
They in effect give Trump and state legislatures and House members license to subvert the process again. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Moriana, No. 20-1573, __ S.Ct. __ (June 15, 2022), and this case involves a classic David v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Surveillance David Davis MP and others are calling for a ban on the Chinese surveillance camera brands Hikvision and Dahua, used by UK government bodies. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 5:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
V Kelly Turner and Emma M French and John Dialesandro and Ariane Middel and David M Hondula and George Ban Weiss and Hana Abdellati, How are cities planning for heat? [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Consider, for example, a recent summary offered by Rosalind Dixon and David Landau of what conservatives have described as the “constitution in exile” that is, presumably, being restored by the new majority on the. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:16 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp Pty v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:32 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Cohen, David S. and Donley, Greer and Rebouche, Rachel, The New Abortion Battleground (February 23, 2022). 123 Columbia Law Review (2023 Forthcoming), U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2022-09, Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2022-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4032931 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4032931: “This Article examines the paradigm shift that will occur if (and, likely, when) the Supreme Court overturns Roe… [read post]
Here, Stanford Law Professor David Freeman Engstrom and Catherina Xu, a member of the Stanford Law School class of 2024, discuss the Court’s ruling in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]