Search for: "State v. Graves"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 8:58 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
The class-action suit, Kortlever et al v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:22 pm
It was 26 years ago, in State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
See Public Utilities Code § 2891.1, also People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious in… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
As I noted in an earlier post, despite the grave threat, many businesses aren’t buying the coverage, even though it’s reasonably priced. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Holder (Attorney General) v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
He then added the following: The State has an interest in ensuring so grave a choice is well informed. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
” State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
The decision was rendered in the matter Marico Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
It said the government had accused him -- though not with formal charges -- of "grave crimes. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
The real implications for states would play out over years, not overnight.Whether or not the Court is right, though, that there is a grave risk of chaos, their ruling states pretty explicitly that the perceived risk of chaos trumps any Commerce Clause concerns. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am
It also allows one state to help another in surveillance for any so-called serious crime. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:22 pm
Objects seized in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 6:46 am
Graves, 848 P.2d 133, 134 (Or. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:11 am
In the last two decades, civil commitment has become less utilized due to a number of factors, such as the Supreme Court decision in O'Connor v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:11 pm
Ex parte Albert Wilding; (In re: Ex parte State (In re: State of Alabama v. [read post]
