Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 8:33 am
In United States of America v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:05 am
Holder in June of 2013, the restrictions that stopped former Jim Crow states from changing their voting laws without first checking with the federal government were lifted. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Scalia’s opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
Holder. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am
Holder, which declared Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
Currently, tens of millions of immigrants — including some green card holders, DACA recipients, TPS holders, and undocumented people — are being denied access to COVID-related testing and treatment. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
Such an approach would, however, mean that liability, and ultimately the scope of the copyright holders’ rights, would depend on the very divergent solutions adopted under the different national legal systems. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:02 am
At 10, the authors state that third parties which are not nominal addressees of the FRAND commitment may still "benefit from the Huawei v ZTE negotiation framework". [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:00 am
In National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am
The case is really a global copyright dispute between a UK holder of those global rights and a Qatari user of the protected content who is using it all over the world. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
United States strengthens the case against Trump's sweeping use of Section 212(f)—here and here: Trump v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
It'll remain to be seen whether Member States enact any freedoms as discussed above, but it would seem highly unlikely given the current state of the World. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
It'll remain to be seen whether Member States enact any freedoms as discussed above, but it would seem highly unlikely given the current state of the World. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
It'll remain to be seen whether Member States enact any freedoms as discussed above, but it would seem highly unlikely given the current state of the World. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
It'll remain to be seen whether Member States enact any freedoms as discussed above, but it would seem highly unlikely given the current state of the World. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:54 pm
What does the Maryland decision mean for DACA holders? [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
