Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 1341 - 1360 of 10,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am
We have tried to add a comparative law element to the study of the jurisprudence of religious liberties in the United States by tying that study to the broader global conversations and currents in the development of legal frameworks for the protection of religious liberty. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Considering Tan Te Lam [1996] UKPC 5, Dyson MR construed para 22 and 29 restrictively and held that: The court should construe strictly any statutory provision which purports to allow the deprivation of individual liberty by administrative detention. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
For the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th AnniversariesBeginning with Griswold v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 3 provides that extradition shall be denied when the offense for which extradition is sought is a political offense or when it is established that the request is in fact made for the purpose of prosecuting the person sought on account of race, religion, nationality or political opinions or when, for the same reasons, the person sought is likely to be denied a fair trial or punished, detained or restricted in his personal liberty. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 am by sally
Supreme Court London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011) Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Daley- Murdock, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2011) Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162 (23 February 2011) Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23 February 2011) 007… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:25 pm by Marc DeGirolami
Setting aside the regrettable state of constitutional free exercise doctrine right now, negotiating the claims of religious liberty against those that oppose them is always a question of getting a little here and losing a little there; the gains are lovely, but they do not compensate for the losses. [read post]