Search for: "State v. Perez"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2008, 1:04 pm
Perez-Grahovac v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Garre argued five cases before the Supreme Court last term: for the respondent in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Dale Beaver v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:08 am
After all, Universal v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:40 am
Radeker and modified in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:49 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jose Antonio Perez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:30 pm
In Brinker Restaurant Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:30 pm
In Brinker Restaurant Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
NO-FAULT - NF-10'S IN DUPLICATE - 11 NYCRR § 65-3.8Prime Psychological Services, PC, a/a/o Raymond Perez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
In today's post, we discuss another retaliation decision by the Supreme Court, Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:45 pm
In Bailey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:00 pm
Perez-Sanchez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Perez, 484 F.3d 735 (2007). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
For starters, there was the unique "direct to consumer" exception to the learned intermediary rule that the Supreme Court had adopted in Perez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
In Bridge v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:45 am
Matter of Miriam M. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Humphries and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
