Search for: "State v. Rodriguez"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
From Khalil v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:35 am
Democracy, Citizenship, and the Pena-Rodriguez Case The Expressive Function of Juries [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am
In Dahlia v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Rodriguez, Carol T. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
William Rodriguez (Sup. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
Rodriguez ruled the searches unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:02 am
It was alleged that she further stated that he had done something to her face. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:29 am
And Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm
Dimaya v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro focuses on the Court’s grant of review in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
"Our side" considered it a loss (I was lobbying for the Innocence Project of Texas on the subject), but the law simply did not give criminal defendants the means to keep eyewitness testimony out of evidence if lineups don't follow written policies, nor if written policies are inadequate.Ironically, though Chief Rodriguez wants to blame the Legislature for his woes, the much more significant penalty for failing to follow best practices was laid down in October by the Texas… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
” Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Many owe their elections to Howard Dean's 50-state strategy which was overwhelmingly vindicated in this election. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
In 1993, in a 5-4 decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
In 1993, in a 5-4 decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
In the case of Gibbons v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:36 am
Rodriguez, 431 U.S. 395, 403 (1977) (internal quotation omitted). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 6:50 am
Relying on Rodriguez v. [read post]