Search for: "State v. Rowe" Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 2:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new ruling made Judge Hinkle’s court the twentieth federal court in a row, over the past fourteen months, to rule as he did, and it followed similar decisions by four separate state court judges in Florida. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The starting point in that cycle was the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
Still other coverage of the Court centers on the Court’s denial of review in challenges by death row inmates seeking additional information about the lethal injection protocols that states intended to use to execute them. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:04 pm by Harold O'Grady
After the recent July 16, 2014 Order Declaring California’s Death Penalty System Unconstitutional by the United States District Court for the Central District Of California in the case of Jones v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
United States – it suggested that the “hypothetical jury” approach was in fact the correct one. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:42 pm by Lovechilde
Dear Madam Attorney General: I write to urge you to not appeal Jones v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by Bill Otis
 One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of a death row inmate who is seeking additional information about the drugs that Arizona intends to use to execute him; the state has now indicated that it plans to ask the Supreme Court to step in. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm by Cicely Wilson
The Supreme Court denied current counsel’s motion to withdraw, holding that there was no ethical violation in requiring counsel to continue to prosecute this appeal for the benefit of the Court in meeting its statutory and constitutional duties.Read More: State Supreme Court orders death-row lawyer to stay on caseCommonwealth v. [read post]