Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 15,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 3:33 pm
., a nationwide operator of charter schools, will pay $570,000 to settle a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit filed by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
Ever since the US Supreme Court ruled in Morrison et al v National Australia Bank Ltd et al that claimants not residing in the United States or American citizens who purchased shares on a foreign exchange can’t settle or litigate their case in the US, these parties have been seeking other jurisdictions to get their claims resolved. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
This ensures stability of legal relations, because it means that a matter which has been definitely settled by judicial decision cannot be referred to the courts by different parties for reconsideration. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:11 am
United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
In Miller v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm
Supreme Court set out in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:50 am
In Hydril Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
Racky Ramchair certainly did.The case is Ramchair v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
In Levine v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:41 pm
A represented employee can settle his workers’ compensation case by signing a release of his workers’ compensation claim in ANY third party litigation cases including: An EEOC claim decided March 6, 2015 by Judge Sojourner: Bond v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
Plaintiff was represented by group 1 and then mid-stream terminated them and moved to attorney group 2, who successfully settled the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:39 pm
In Lafarge North America, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Phillips v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:40 am
It is settled law that that removal of children should usually be effected pursuant to an Emergency Protection Order (EPO), and that section 46 should only be used where it is not practicable to execute an EPO (Langley -v- Liverpool City Council). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
Scott v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
She paid twice to settle that case but not before an appeals court ruled that denial of her anti-SLAPP motion was proper. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 9:35 am
In June, the case settled without any further courtroom developments. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court's recent decision in Wills v. [read post]
