Search for: "State v. Spot" Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Apparently, "romanettes":Monday's Supreme Court oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
  The yolas had been spotted in international waters by patrol aircraft and were ultimately searched by federal agents. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:17 am by Michael DelSignore
The Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that a defendant deserves the right to present expert testimony on the issue of identification in the case of State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:28 am by Viking
”  For some reason that’s why it struck me that United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 5:03 am by Kevin
Barton: Next Congress Will Focus on Online Privacy EU wants stronger online privacy rules Air Force warns against location-based app Australian Mobile Telecommunications Assocation LBS Guidelines Data Quality/Liability Google Tool May Have Had Wrong Polling Place Faulty GPS tells soldiers in Afghanistan they are in Africa National Security/Law Enforcement State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:44 am
By way of excuse for not spotting it first the IPKat explains that, while he checks the Curia website daily for signs of fresh IP cases, this particular decision hadn't yet been posted by that admirably early when the Kat checked it out ...Case T-9/07, Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, PepsiCo Inc, as David points out, is the first from an EU court to discuss in detail the meaning of several key aspects of the current European law… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:28 am by Viking
”  For some reason that’s why it struck me that United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
A snow sculpture contest*(Register in advance to guarantee a spot in the contest). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:28 am by Viking
”  For some reason that’s why it struck me that United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The Client loses on account stated, which is well described in this decision. [read post]