Search for: "State v. W" Results 1341 - 1360 of 15,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently weighed in on the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s influential opinion in Stern v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
”’” (Id. at p. 382, quoting Graham, supra, 560 U.S. at p. 69 and Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Norton valuably reminds us, for example, of the important inclusionary effect of President George W. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am by ASAD KHAN
Insight could be gained from W (Algeria) [2012] UKSC 8 into the systemic use of torture by Algeria, but that was no substitute for an assessment by SIAC. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:20 pm by Lowell Brown
In other results, the following individuals were elected to the State Bar of Texas Board of Directors: Christopher V. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Monday 26 March 2012 are the appeals from the Supreme Court of Mauritius of Dookee  v The State of Mauritius and anor and Sakoor Patel and ors v Anandsing Beenessreesing and Sicom Ltd. [read post]