Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of Slusher's claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm by Schachtman
Back in the day, some Circuits of the United States Court of Appeal embraced an asymmetric standard of review of district court decisions concerning the admissibility of expert witness opinion evidence. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The United States Constitution guarantees the right to trial by a jury of one's peers. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Just found them via Google Alerts and only have had time to read FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:07 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Supreme Court rendered a notable opinion in January 2016. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:13 pm by Nathan Diament
The free exercise and establishment clauses of the First Amendment were wisely crafted to ensure maximal religious freedom in the United States of America. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Trevor Burrus and Reilly Stephens weigh in on Gundy v. [read post]