Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 am
If you subscribe to Sweet & Maxwell's European Patent Decisions, please note that Release 30, with a publication date of October 2009, has now been released, updating this looseleaf to September 2009. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 7:26 am
 High volume, low complexity work – The bottom right of the graph illustrates work that is ideally suited to LPO and is the ’sweet spot’ for LPO. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don’t infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity: Lucent… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity: Lucent… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
That's an interesting case, but we're not calling it a First Amendment issue.The remaining two Alliance-Sebelius cases are worth noting (even if they involve only dietary supplements, rather than prescription drugs, which are this blog's sweet spot).In Alliance for Natural Health US v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is often the short-and-sweet version of bankruptcy. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:24 pm
Prust v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:03 am
While Hughen tried to rely upon Michigan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
Aww, that's sweet. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
Here is a Hutchinson News article reporting that Sarah Sweet-McKinnon won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:50 pm
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 6, 2009 - 10 AM: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See Volusia County v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
It is short, it is sweet, and it appears entirely deserved. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:59 pm
" Segal v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:03 pm
Your friend, Marin After the jump, Death Match: Christmas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Stone Sweet & F. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 11:49 pm
This is the first time any of the Courts of Appeal have resolved this issue, which is must reading for anyone who wants to know why they cannot hear a particular song on demand when streaming music online.The case is Arista Records v. [read post]
