Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 6,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Leaving aside the rather predictable (given the team's public dilation on the issue of a potential name change) instance of trade mark squatting, most of the IP interest came from proceedings in the TTAB and the District Court of Virginia, and the subsequent ruling of the Supreme Court in Matal v Tam. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
Blog posts & press:Asylum in Europe 2019: Human Rights under Pressure (AIDA, Aug. 2020) [text]EU’s Planned ‘Deportation Machine’: Expensive, Dangerous and Lacking in Transparency and Accountability Measures (Statewatch, Aug. 2020) [text]How the Coronavirus Pandemic may be Shaping Our Feelings about People Crossing the Channel in Small Boats (The Conversation, Aug. 2020) [text]I've Been Watching Desperate People Seek Protection in Europe for 20… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:31 am
On 11 August 2020, the Court of Appeal (CA) handed down its judgement in the case of R (on the application of Edward BRIDGES) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
He views Justice Marshall, in the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:43 am
Similarly, in Murray v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Pareja v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:31 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:19 pm
But that line was already crossed in the Obamacare case. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
” Tullis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 12:38 pm
(Liberte v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
The remaining category of American religious-liberty controversies involves exemptions for religious exercise and accommodations for religious people. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:42 am
India Foundation for Media Professionals v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
This term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
