Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals held that the district court was not bound to apply either the Uniform Comparative Fault Act or the pro tanto approach of the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act, but that the allocation should be made by the district court based on such equitable factors as the district court deems appropriate. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:04 pm
There are the trial courts, which are referred to as Federal District Courts. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
Counsel argued that the Village wasn’t asking for the Court to circumvent the legislature by crafting a uniform system; all that was necessary was for the Court to rule that a public employer could not be bound by a pension board decis [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:28 am
Enforcement of the policy may not have been uniform. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:26 am
Predominance under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:14 am
The district court denied the motion, holding that it lacked jurisdiction because the guiltily plea had already been withdrawn and her case dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:39 am
Reno (CDA I District Ct. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:46 pm
District Court action against four former bank executives of the recently failed IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., I can unequivocally reject that notion. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Attorneys’ offices and the countless District Attorneys’ offices across the country. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:08 am
In this case, the appeals court found that the district court inappropriately discounted several considerations that militated in favor of finding that Drive and ResourceMFG were joint employers of the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
Judge Gibson (pic) from the NSW District Court has been critical of the “sheer awfulness” of the Uniform Defamation Act, which she says has “no understanding of the internet”. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The district court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss based on preemption. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:03 am
Rule 23. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
A federal district court granted summary judgment to the university. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:52 am
” However, the RSA 674:32– provided that when “agricultural activities are not explicitly addressed with respect to any zoning district or location, they shall be deemed to be permitted there, as either a primary or accessory use, so long as conducted in accordance with … federal and state laws, regulations, and rules. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
A federal district court granted summary judgment to UT Austin. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Whether or not applying the 2nd Circuit’s test would have rendered a different outcome for Meche is unknown, but unsurprisingly, Meche argues that the 2nd Circuit’s test should be adopted by the Supreme Court as the uniform maritime rule. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JESUSA ACOSTA, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00110-CV, 406 SW3d 711, 06-26-13) 13-0577 THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:38 am
Reviewing for clear error a district court’s decision denying Rule 23 class certification to two classes—an unpaid but on-the-clock class and a working-during-meal-break class—the Ninth Circuit found no FedEx policy that prevented on-the-clock (but not on-shift) employees from using their time for their own benefit nor that FedEx knew or should have known that some of its employees were working through their meal breaks. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 12:48 pm
American families are increasingly becoming more mobile, and different states have varying rules regarding the guardianship process. [read post]
