Search for: "US v. CLARK " Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
Her development company applied for a special use permit in Clarke County to operate a boarding kennel of more than five dogs, but her application met with resistance from Robina R. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am by Andy
Understandably District Judge Clarke reserved her judgment, but today this has been handed down. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:44 am by David M. Goldman
Prior to the Supreme Courts holding in Clark, the courts in Florida were split as to whether inherited IRAs were exempt. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am by INFORRM
In that judgment (with which both Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson agree) the Court carefully reviews the history of Wilkinson v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
Lord Hodge (with whom Lords Clarke, Wilson and Toulson agreed) held that the licences granted to ZH and CN were not licences to occupy premises as a dwelling. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Lewis & Clark Law School, has posted The Public Trust Doctrine, Private Water Allocation, and Mono Lake: The Historic Saga of National Audubon Society v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]