Search for: "US v. Wilson" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:34 am by Frank Cranmer
The elders appealed: in brief, they sought a declaration that the Personal Information Protection Act unjustifiably infringed ss.2(a), (b) and (d) and s.8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it related to the collection, use or disclosure of personal information for religious purposes [37]. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:58 pm by Natalma M. McKnew
As the FTC Commission’s dissenter Christine Wilson reminds us in her statement, ”this is likely the only opportunity for public input before the commission issues a final rule. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 7:30 am
Kolon case and how to use, or avoid, it in your trade secret case" – Griffith Price of Finnegan’s Washington, D.C. office; "Litigating Trade Secret Cases before the ITC – The future of TianRui Group v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 Lord Wilson asks whether its relevance is just as an extra argument to support the respondents’ case? [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Parliamentarians, including former Brexit Secretary David Davis, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Green MP Caroline Lucas and human rights organisations have called on the retail group owned by Mike Ashley to stop using facial recognition surveillance in their stores. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The bill would also clarify rules for the use of machine-learning technologies and personal data for scientific research. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am by Russ Bensing
  About twenty years after Wilson, the court in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Judge Wilson also held that plaintiff’s case would create a de facto labelling standard using state law that was stricter than the FDCA requirement and, therefore the case was preempted. [read post]