Search for: "United States v. Anthony" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
Accordingly, JBT is not entitled to summary judgment. * Anthony B. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders takes to the lectern, she barely makes it into her third sentence before Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asks her about the language in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
Bullock, a case that might allow the Court to reconsider its decision two years ago in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
At the epicenter is Anthony Levandowski, who on his way out of Google downloaded 14,000 documents to his personal computer. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am by Ilya Shapiro and Trevor Burrus
United States (1935) is the foundational case upon which independent agencies were created. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 6:07 am by Austen Parrish
The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:01 pm
' Challenge Sandra Day O'Connor - Supreme Court - United States - Supreme Court of the United States - Government [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am by Mansell Law
On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court published its decision in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am by Catherine Fisk
 As Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy) noted in Lehnert v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
As in Empagran, the Court may say that even if the claim has a connection with the United States, the connection must be strong enough to make the exercise of jurisdiction not “unreasonable. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]