Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
United States; Shelby v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
For illustrative purposes, this book considers the key phases of jury trials (opening statements, direct and cross-examination, closing arguments and voir dire) in the light of a particular case: United States of America v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 pm
" Brief for the United States in Opposition, Stevenson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Anti-circumvention requirements make surprising cameos in the United States's bilateral free trade agreements with Jordan, Singapore, Chile, Australia and several other countries (more information here). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Third Circuit decision addresses free speech and termination for just cause issuesRita Miller v Clinton County [Pennsylvania], USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket # 07-2105In this case, the Circuit Court of Appeals sets out the guidelines followed by courts in resolving claims by public officers and employees that their employer has violated their First Amendment right to free speech and the impact of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement on judicial control over the hiring,… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 11:16 pm
United States, 48 M.J. 639 (A. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 3:23 pm
"We continue to assume that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires a speedy sentencing and find that the sentencing delay in this case violated [Clinton H.] [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
" Goldsmith, 526 U.S. at 534; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
McCain’s views may matter especially to Hillary Clinton supporters, many of whom are pro-choice; according to syndicated columnist Froma Harrop, “[T]hey’ll want to know this: Would McCain stock the Supreme Court with foes of Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
But this case is not about the United States' or Texas' rights to implement criminal laws. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 8:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (7): Clinton McConnell v. [read post]
