Search for: "United States v. John White" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Jack reflected on the significance of military commissions, particularly in light of some of last week’s events in the United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
More than a dozen such motions were brought on Monday in Boston’s federal jury trial of United States vs. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm by Jim Gerl
Some states in the United States have implemented laws to address school bullying. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Perry and United States v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
”  The office relied on training from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, he said, adding, “It’s obvious it received bad training from the federal government. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
The question of citizen detention arose briefly at the very outset of the conflict in Afghanistan, thanks to the capture of “American Taliban” John Walker Lindh. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am by The Charge
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957) in which it afforded broad discovery opportunities in federal criminal cases. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
” The White House has also asked Sen. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
I’d contrast my view, for example, with Toobin’s view of Chief Justice John Roberts in Citizens United. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:24 am by Venkat
The banks submitted affidavits demonstrating that they had no activity or customers in the United States, and therefore they should not be subject to personal jurisdiction in the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-884, involving state authority in the field of immigration, without comment beyond a one-line notation that “Justice Scalia dissents. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]