Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 1341 - 1360 of 22,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 11:15 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
Drug Enforcement Administration announced that Epidiolex has been classified as a Schedule V drug, legal for sale in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 are due to be overruled by the United States Supreme Court....First, the central holding of Roe -- that there is a constitutional right to have an abortion based on a judicially created trimester framework -- has no grounding in the text of the United States Constitution....Second, the right to have an abortion has no foundation "so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Throughout 2018, new surveillance practices continued to erode the privacy of people in Latin America. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 10:07 am by Gerard Magliocca
United States is the first case to use the term. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by Howard Wasserman
The United States has filed federal hate-crimes charges against Grafton Thomas, accused of stabbing five people at a shul during a Chanukah celebration. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So the Ninth Circuit holds today in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by West Coast Environmental Law
From across the border, Canadians have been watching the fallout from recent decisions from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
For comparison's sake, the United States Supreme Court held in Simmons that a defendant's incriminating statements in support of a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds (e.g., an admission that he owned the suitcase in which the drugs were found) weren't admissible at trial, holding that it's "intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another. [read post]