Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 1341 - 1360 of 5,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by SHG
Via John Wesley Hall at the Fourth Amendment Blog, courtesy of Liberty and Justice For Y'all, the 5th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:06 pm by Daniel Thies - Guest
For all the complexity of the statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by Unknown
 and 7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by Unknown
 and 7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm by Michael Weil
  While some groups had early success, United States District Court Judge Dolly Gee denied a request by Uber and Postmates to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of AB 5 against them while their constitutional challenge to the law plays out, in Olson, et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
In 2007, Dana Corporation filed for reorganisation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:34 pm
On the one hand, the CAFC noted the CAFC's decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sept. 17, 2008), the United States District Court of Colorado held the presumptive lead plaintiff adequate to represent the class because its “contracts for difference” (“CFD) were “securities” under the Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:45 pm
The United States's amicus brief is available here. [read post]