Search for: "V Force Customs, Inc." Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Concerned about how the mandates and costs of  the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act will impact your corporate and family finances following the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ… [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
” Westrick advised management that they had to “immediately notify our customers of the degradation problems we are experiencing,” and SCBA had to “pull Second Chance Armor vests from their customers. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am by Geoffrey Manne
 The whole thing is worth reading, but here’s a snippet: As the Supreme Court explained in Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The S-K disclosures will be required for annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2023, and the 8-K requirements come into force by December 18, 2023.[27] Companies will have only months to align their internal disclosure processes with the new incident reporting requirements. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:54 am by Kristian Soltes
Amex involved a government challenge to anti-steering rules that American Express imposes on merchants to prevent them from encouraging customers to use cheaper payment alternatives. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Not surprisingly, amid post-breach litigation, there typically arises an intense battle over the confidentiality of post-breach digital forensic reports, forcing courts to interpret and nuance conventional notions of attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine in an entirely new context, which can sometimes result in inconsistent or disappointing court decisions. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 58; Westcoast Energy Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
“We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
However, Louisiana differs from most states in that it does not provide an exemption for the lease or rental of tangible personal property for re-lease or re-rental to a third party.[7] Thus, for example, if a company in the business of renting tangible property to third parties does not have sufficient equipment on hand to meets its customer’s needs and has to rent property from third parties to fulfill contracts, the company would have pay tax on its rental of the goods and then… [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
A law lecturer claims the small print in Three’s contracts may allow millions of its mobile customers to avoid higher bills. [read post]